Baseball Geometry

After producing the third-lowest home run total in the National League, the New York Mets are altering the dimensions of their home park, Citi Field.

https://www.espn.com/new-york/mlb/story/_/id/7174665/new-york-mets-officially-announce-citi-field-dimension-changes

Only 108 home runs were hit at Citi in 2011.  The reconfigured outfield, from left to right, will have new distances from home plate of 335, 358, 385, 408, 398, 375, and 330 feet.   The old distances were 335, 371, 384, 408, 415, 378, and 330.

The Mets claim that this reduces the in-play surface by 2 percent.  The area of play more than 300 feet from home plate will be reduced by 5 percent.

Comparing the areas of these regions is a fun little math problem.  The real question, of course, is how many more home runs will be hit at Citi Field next year?

Math Lesson: Fantasy Football

My latest contribution to the New York Times Learning Network is a Math Lesson designed around a simple Fantasy Football-style game.

https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/put-me-in-coach-getting-in-the-quantitative-game-with-fantasy-football/

In this lesson, students use data, statistics, and a novel matchup metric to evaluate players and choose their teams.

As the results come in every week, students can refine their strategies and try to make more accurate projections!

A One-in-a-Million Baseball Play

As the 2011 MLB season winds down, there is a slim chance of something very unusual happening:  a three-way tie for the wild card playoff birth!

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/7005248/three-way-tie-american-league-wild-card-race-cause-logistical-nightmare

It seems highly unlikely that the Red Sox, Rays, and Angels will actually all finish in a dead-heat, but if they do, it will pose a lot of problems for playoff scheduling.

This is a fun, if complicated, math question to think about:  what are the chances that after a 162-game season, three of the eleven teams ultimately vying for the wild card end up with identical records?

To investigate, the first thing I’d do is simplify the situation.  I’d reduce the number of teams and the number of games, give every team a 50/50 chance to win every game, and then see what happens.  After I’d explored a bit, I’d then consider complicating matters by using more teams, more games, and more realistic winning percentages.

A math challenge that any Strat-o-matic player could love!

Kickoffs, Touchbacks, and Scoring in the NFL

goalpostsTwo weeks in and my prediction that NFL per-game scoring would be down in 2011 isn’t looking so good.

As predicted, the number of touchbacks on kickoffs has risen dramatically.  In week one, 50 percent of kickoffs were touchbacks, up from around 16% of all kickoffs in 2010.  The increased number of touchbacks, and the consequential reduction in field position, led me to speculate that scoring would drop by a few points per game.

But the numbers tell a different story.  Not only was Week 1 the second highest scoring opening weekend in NFL history, but Week 2 saw even more offensive production.  So far in 2011, teams are scoring a combined 46.63 points per game; in 2010, that number was 44.07.  Thus, scoring is up by about 2.5 points per game.

But I’m not giving up on my hypothesis just yet.  Like a good statistician, I’ll just blame the sample size for the discrepancy!  The season is still young:  let’s see what where we are in January.

Related Posts

 

Will Scoring Decrease Under New NFL Kickoff Rule?

football-kickoffIn an attempt to reduce player injury, the National Football League has modified their kickoff rule for the 2011 NFL season.  Kickoffs, which occur after scores and at the beginning of each half, will now be taken from a team’s 35 yard line.  Moving the kickoff five yards downfield may seem like a minor change, but significant consequences have already been seen in pre-season games.

As expected, the number of “touchbacks”, or un-returned kickoffs, has dramatically increased.  The kickoff return is an exciting play in football, and decreasing the number of returns has some fans and observers worried that the games won’t be as fun to watch.  As a football fan, I see this as a legitimate issue, but as a quantitative-minded person, my first thought was “How will this new rule affect scoring?”.

I looked at AdvancedNFLStats.com, an excellent collection of unique quantitative analysis by Brian Burke.  In a post examining the value of a touchback, Burke creates a graph of expected points by 1st down field position.  For example, the ordered pair (60, 1.2) on the graph represents the following piece of information:  teams starting on their own 40-yard line will score about 1.2 points per possession on average.

It’s no surprise that the graphs displays a negative correlation:  as distance from goal increases, expected points decrease.  But it is somewhat surprising how linear the relationship looks.  A rough estimate suggests that the slope of the line is about -1 / 20;  this means that for every additional 20 yards of distance from the goal, the team will, on average, score one less point per possession.

This is where the new kickoff rule comes in.  More touchbacks means more drives starting on the 20 yard line, and this will likely decrease the average starting field position for both teams.  More yards to goal means less points scored per possession.  The question now is, how much less?

Well, the average starting field position after a kickoff around the 27 yard line.  In the 2011 pre-season, 34% of kickoffs were touchbacks, up from 16% last year.  A touchback results in a team starting at the 20 yard line.

If the overall average starting position is the 27 yard line, we can use the following equation to find the average starting field position for a non-touchback kickoff:

(0.16)(20) + (0.84) (X) = 27

Solving for X gives us the average starting field position after a non-touchback kickoff, which is around the 28.33 yard line.

Let’s assume that non-touchback kickoffs will be unaffected by the rule change and so, on average, will start at around the 28.33 yard line.  If the touchback percentage for the regular season rises to 34%, this means that the new average starting field position after a kickoff will be

(0.34)(20) + (0.66) (28.33)

This comes out to around 25.5.  This suggests that the new rule will cost each offense, on average, about 1.5 yards of field position per kickoff.  With around ten kickoffs per game, this translates into 15 total yards of lost field position, and that equals about 0.75 total points lost per game.

It’s possible that the rule change could affect non-touchback kickoff returns as well, as the coverage team may now have a greater advantage.  A reduction in non-kickoff returns by, say, 3 yards, would mean the overall average starting field position after a kickoff would be

(0.34)(20) + (0.66) (25.33) = 23.5

That is, around the 23.5 yard line.  This could translate into almost two points less per game!

This is an admittedly rudimentary analysis, but it’s an easy way to start a quantitative investigation of this rule change.  And it will make watching the scores this year even more fun!

Related Posts

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: