Math That Connects Where We’re Going to Where We’ve Been — Quanta Magazine

My latest column for Quanta Magazine is about the power of creative thinking in mathematics, and how understanding problems from different perspectives can lead us to surprising new conclusions. It starts with one of my all-time favorite problems:

Say you’re at a party with nine other people and everyone shakes everyone else’s hand exactly once. How many handshakes take place?

This is the “handshake problem,” and it’s one of my favorites. As a math teacher, I love it because there are so many different ways you can arrive at the solution, and the diversity and interconnectedness of those strategies beautifully illustrate the power of creative thinking in math.

By connecting different approaches like counting and recursion, we can connect mathematical ideas across disciplines and discover new relationships.

Like all my columns for Quanta, this piece is free to read at QuantaMagazine.org.

The Surprising Simple Math Behind Puzzling Matchups — Quanta Magazine

My latest column for Quanta Magazine is about one of my all-time favorite mathematical ideas: transitivity. Well, technically it’s about intransitivity, a subtly complex mathematical situation which any sports fan knows all about.

It’s the championship game of the Imaginary Math League, where the Atlanta Algebras will face the Carolina Cross Products. The two teams haven’t played each other this season, but earlier in the year Atlanta defeated the Brooklyn Bisectors by a score of 10 to 5, and Brooklyn defeated Carolina by a score of 7 to 3. Does that give us any insight into who will take the title?

Well, here’s one line of thought. If Atlanta beat Brooklyn, then Atlanta is better than Brooklyn, and if Brooklyn beat Carolina, then Brooklyn is better than Carolina. So, if Atlanta is better than Brooklyn and Brooklyn is better than Carolina, then Atlanta should be better than Carolina and win the championship.

Sports fan knows things are never this simple, and in my column I explore some of the surprising mathematical reasons why it may be the case that A is better than B and B is better than C, but C is better than A. You can read the full column for free here.

Books I Read in 2023

Here’s a selection of books that made an impact on me in 2023.

Superforecasting tells the story of psychologist Philip Tetlock’s project to systematically evaluate the predictions of experts. What exactly does an advisor mean when they tell the President that a military operation has a “good chance” of being successful? It wasn’t so long ago that no one thought to even ask such a question, and as Tetlock shows, the consequences couldn’t be more real. Tetlock’s work led to the development of the Good Judgement project, a forecasting competition designed to identify the characteristics of “superforecasters”, individuals with a quantifiable talent for predicting how world events will unfold. It’s a great book, and one I was partly inspired to read because of my involvement in a student forecasting tournament based on the Good Judgement project (where our students took first and second place overall!)

I finally read The Lady Tasting Tea, by David Salsburg, which had been on my list for a while. It’s an excellent history of the development of statistics, told through fascinating characters and interesting anecdotes. It immediately joined my student lending library, and it also took second place on the list of statistics book I’ve learned the most from (to be fair, it’s first on the list of books I’ve learned from by reading it rather than writing it). It’s full of fun little details, like this quote I shared with my linear algebra class the very day I read it.

Manil Suri’s The Big Bang of Numbers was a highlight of my year, both because it’s a unique book that tells a whimsical origin story of mathematics full of insight, humor, and even spirituality, and also because I had the privilege to interview Manil Suri at the Jaipur Literature Festival this past year (video here).

Made to Stick, by Chip and Dan Heath, is the book that I’ve been thinking most about as a teacher this year. Why do silly ideas go viral while important ideas struggle to take hold? It’s a question every teacher should consider, and Made to Stick offers lots to think about. Months later I’m still pondering the power of generative metaphors, story as simulation, and why people should care about duo piano. Thanks to my (former) student Satvik for the recommendation!

Atomic Habits by James Clear was another book that had been on my list, and it was a worthwhile read even if confirmed many previously held beliefs. A core idea of the book is very mathematical, namely that the impact of habits compound like interest in a bank account, generating exponential (hopefully, positive) personal growth.

I feel a bit funny saying that John Fleischman’s Phineas Gage was probably the best book I read this year, seeing as its target audience is middle school students. But this infamous story of the 19th-century man who blasted a railroad spike through his brain and lived to tell about it is so vivid, engaging, and expertly contextualized in the history of science that it keeps coming up in thoughts and conversations.

In fiction, I enjoyed Susanna Clarke’s Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell, a fantastical history of magic in Britain told through the story of the apprenticeship-turned-rivalry of the title characters. Amor Towles’s A Gentleman in Moscow was one of the loveliest books I’ve read in a long time. And I enjoyed every moment of Elmore Leonard’s Get Shorty. Leonard also authored the stickiest advice I read in 2023: don’t write the parts that the reader skips.

In addition to getting back to my year-end lists (sorry, 2022) I’ve been trying to be more active on Bookwyrm, the ActivityPub-based social network dedicated to reading and reviewing. You can find me there at phonner.

And thanks, as always, to the (shamefully underfunded) Brooklyn Public Library for making it so easy to read this year and every year.

Related Posts

2023 — Year in Review

As I reflect on my professional 2023 I keep coming back to the line “Normal is normal again.” Not the world, certainly, and not for everyone, but since changing schools nearly five years ago this is the first year when being in the classroom hasn’t felt extraordinary for extraordinary reasons.

Still, it’s been a mix of the new and the old. In addition to my normal lineup of geometry, calculus, and linear algebra courses, I’ve been doing more mathematical modeling with students this year. In the spring we had a team of modelers invited to compete in the International Mathematical Modeling Contest (IM2C), thanks to their excellent work on last year’s High School Mathematical Contest in Modeling (HiMCM), and I’ve been working to expand the program at school. This year interest was high enough to have eight teams compete in the HiMCM, and we’re looking forward to new modeling opportunities this spring. In addition, a colleague and I mentored around 70 students who competed in a national forecasting tournament inspired by the Good Judgement project, and our teams took first and second place!

An extracurricular highlight this year was interviewing mathematician and author Manil Suri for the Jaipur Literature Festival. We had a lively talk about his excellent new book, The Big Bang of Numbers, and also about math, writing, and teaching, and the Asia Society of New York made the entire video of our conversation available here.

As usual, I continued to design and run workshops for teachers this year, including a new entry in my ongoing linear algebra series titled Learning to Love Row Reduction. I also gave two talks at this year’s NCTM Annual Meeting: So, You’re Teaching Pre-Calculus, and A Case for Linear Algebra. I’m already looking ahead to new talks this coming year, including an upcoming workshop on the geometry of linear regression I’ll be presenting in February.

Writing my column for Quanta Magazine was as challenging, and fulfilling, as ever, with pieces aimed at bridging the gap between classroom and research math focused on the newly discovered aperiodic monotile, the algebra of secret codes, graph theory and cliques, a high school student’s amazing proof, and what three-point turns tell us about a hundred-year-old geometry problem.

And with the landscape of social media continuing to change, I’ve been enjoying my time on Mastodon more and more in 2023.

Platforms based on decentralization, user autonomy, and interoperability definitely seem like the right way forward. And I’ve been trying to do a better job of archiving what I write by cross-posting some of my social media posts here on my blog.

It’s been a good 2023, and here’s hoping for another good, and relatively normal, 2024!

Related Posts

Pierre de Fermat’s Link to a High School Student’s Prime Math Proof — Quanta Magazine

My latest column for Quanta Magazine tells the mathematical story of the incredible high school student who proved a result about not-quite prime numbers that had eluded mathematicians for decades.

[Daniel] Larsen was a high school student in 2022 when he proved a result about a certain kind of number that had eluded mathematicians for decades. He proved that Carmichael numbers — a curious kind of not-quite-prime number — could be found more frequently than was previously known, establishing a new theorem that will forever be associated with his work. So, what are Carmichael numbers? To answer that, we need to go back in time.

You can read the full article for free here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: