Economics

This is an interesting article about variations on the pay-what-you-wish pricing model that has gained some attention in the last few years.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/caring-with-cash-or-how-radiohead-could-have-made-more-money

The band Radiohead famously offered their album “In Rainbows” on their website and asked fans to pay whatever they wanted for the download.  The actual sales numbers are well-guarded, but  it appears to have been a success.

The above article details how an amusement park merged the pay-what-you-want approach with a half-goes-to-charity approach (telling the customer that half of the purchase price is donated to charity).  The product in question was a picture of the customer riding a roller coaster.  Let’s abbreviate with PWYW (Pay What You Wish), HGTC (Half Goes to Charity), and PWWTY (pay-what-we-tell-you):

When given the opportunity to pay whatever they wanted, participation increased dramatically, but revenue was still low–only 92 cents per person.  But when combined with the half-goes-to-charity approach, participation was much higher and the price paid was significantly higher.  Even after taking out the half for charity, revenue was still up by a factor of three!

This is a very interesting approach to pricing, and there are some cool psychological and sociological principles at work here.  And it’s another set of factors to consider when that salesperson is working on you.

NPR ran an interesting article about how much it costs to make a hit pop song.

Using a Rhianna song as an example, this article breaks down the approximate costs for songwriters, producers, engineering, and marketing.

Before reading the article, take a guess as to how much of the money spent on making a “hit” song goes to creative artists:  you’ll almost certainly be surprised.