Seatings and Sums of Squares

MfA InvitationAt Math for America events, guests are traditionally invited to find their seats in some math-y way.  (This is just one of the many ways MfA uses math creatively at their functions).  Here is my seating card from a recent dinner at the MoMA.

The keynote speaker, Dr. Eric Lander, is, among many other things, a mathematician-turned biologist who has been working on the human genome project.  Dr. Lander gave a remarkably clear explanation of the inherent mathematics of genetics.  And, as a lover of number theory, Dr Lander expressed some appreciation for the seating assignments.

Dr. Lander pointed out that the mathematical fact on display here is that every integer can be expressed as a sum of four squares.  This is commonly known as the Lagrange Four Square Theorem.

Here are a few examples of the phenomenon:

sums of four squares

Dr. Lander, a former International Mathematics Olympiad competitor, said that it is fairly easy to show that you need at least four squares to express every number as such a sum, but it’s much harder to show that you need at most four squares to get the job done.

Of course, the words “easy” and “hard” probably have unique meaning to someone cracking the human genome for a living!

Baseball Bailouts

Baseball MoneyThere’s an interesting article in the NYT about the economics of baseball’s revenue-sharing system.

The revenue-sharing system is essentially a robin-hood style redistribution of baseball income, taking money from the most profitable teams and dividing it up among the least profitable.   The system, in theory, gives smaller-market teams a chance to compete with their big-market brethren by providing them with addtional cash to invest on players.  But are the recipients of these baseball bailouts really using the money to improve their teams?  Thanks to an anonymous leak last summer, the public was given an unprecedented look at some MLB financial information.

It was quite interesting to see that the Pittsburgh Pirates, who not only have posted a league-record 18 consecutive losing seasons but also rank near the bottom of the MLB in both popularity and team payroll, have actually been quite profitable the past few years.  For example, in 2007 and 2008 the Pirates, who routinely traded away their best players, not only made around $30 million in profit but also collected around $70 million in revenue sharing payouts!

Maybe the owners of the Pirates have figured out that spending their yearly $35 million bonus on players doesn’t increase revenue enough to make it worthwhile.  Why not just take the safe money?  Not a bad year for a business that hasn’t seen success in two decades.

Testing the Testers

mc testThe SAT has long been a thorn in the side of students, parents, and teachers everywhere.  At some point it became the standard for establishing academic potential, and we’ve been forced to deal with it ever since.

It’s almost too easy to loathe the SAT and its administrative body, the College Board:  they rake in billions in revenue for providing an assessment that is of debatable value; they have helped create a mindset and industry around the idea of “test prep”;  and the College Board has positioned itself as a significant voice in education policy.  Worst of all is that, at their heart, they are a secretive entity accountable to no one.

Which makes stories like this all the sweeter.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/ConsumerNews/teen-student-finds-longer-sat-essay-equals-score/story?id=12061494

A smart high school student, Milo Beckman, had a hypothesis about the essay component of the SAT:  he thought that longer essays earned higher scores, independent of quality.  So he took a poll of his classmates, correlated the length of their essays with their eventual scores, and ran a regression analysis on the data.  The results?

Milo says out of 115 samples, longer essays almost always garnered higher scores.

“The probability that such a strong correlation would happen by chance is 10 to the negative 18th. So 00000 …18 zeros and then (an) 18. Which is zero,” he said.

And Milo’s hypothesis seems in line with the opinions of some other prominent SAT critics.

Maybe these important exams are being so closely examined?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: