Why Top Students Don’t Want to Teach

chart -- why students dont want to teachThis is a very interesting report from the business consulting firm McKinsey about why top students in U.S. colleges don’t want to become teachers.

http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/social-sector/our-insights/attracting-and-retaining-top-talent-in-us-teaching

For example, of the 1500 students surveyed (all of whom were considered top-third in their schools), only 33 percent thought that they could support a family with this career.  And only 37 percent said that people in this job are considered “successful”.

It’s small consolation that two-thirds felt that they, and their families, would be proud to tell people that they were teachers.

Pascal’s, and Rascal’s, Triangles

Pascal’s Triangle is one of the most well-known mathematical constructions in human history.  Named after Blaise Pascal, the triangle is rich in patterns and famous number sequences.  The first five rows are shown below.

Pascal triangle five rows

There are many ways to produce Pascal’s Triangle, but the typical way is to define every number as the sum of the two numbers above it:  the one above on the right and the one above on the left.  If there isn’t a number, then just use zero.  For example, 4  = 1 + 3, and 6 = 3 + 3.

The ubiquity of Pascal’s Triangle makes it even more remarkable that a group of three junior high school students have recently collaborated on a paper published in the College Mathematics Journal that uses the famous triangle to find a new number pattern!

Apparently the story begins with one of the students confounding their teacher by insisting that the fifth row of the triangle should be

rascal numbers

Despite the teacher’s attempts to “correct” them, the students produced a valid recursive relationship for the new triangle, which they describe as ( East * West + 1 ) / North.  They then went on to link their definition to a known sequence in the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences and Voila!, mathematical immortality!

As if the story of three eighth-graders publishing a paper in a college mathematics journal isn’t cool enough, the students collaborated entirely via the internet:  one lives in Washington State, one in Alberta, Canada, and one in Indonesia!

A truly inspiring and remarkable story, and an object lesson in encouraging students to pursue their “wrong” answers!

More on College Rankings

college rankingsThis article in the New York Times discusses a controversy surrounding a recent ranking of colleges that put Egypt’s University of Alexandria among the top 200 universities in the world.  An informed observer describes the school as “not even the best university in Alexandria“.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/15/education/15iht-educLede15.html

How did this school achieve such a high ranking?  In a subcategory measuring the impact of research, which counted for approximately 33% of the school’s overall score, the University of Alexandria placed fourth in the world, ahead of Harvard and Stanford.  Sound fishy?  Seems as though most of the research citations came from one professor who published 320 articles in a journal he, himself, was in charge of.

Trying to come up with quantitative measures for colleges (or high schools, or teachers) is tricky business.  Not only is it hard to agree on what to measure, but it’s tough to figure out how to measure it.

And once the rating culture sets in, gaming of the system, as seen in this particular case, will inevitably follow.  “Tell me how I will be measured, and I will tell you how I will behave“.  I’m not sure who said this originally, but an engineer friend shared it with me many years ago, and it always comes to mind in these situations.

Hopefully in the future, more schools will follow the example of Reed College and refuse to participate in these rankings.

Metrocard Calculations

metrocard imageThe following article from the New York Times discusses the recent fare increase for public transit in NYC:

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/m-t-a-meets-to-increase-transit-fares/

The base fare for a ride on a NYC subway or bus is now $2.25, and price changes have been made both to the monthly unlimited-ride cards and the bulk-purchase bonus rate.

For those of us who live in New York and frequently use public transit, we are faced with the following optimization problem:  is it better to buy the monthly unlimited-use card for $104, or purchase some amount of “single-rides” in bulk and receive a 7% bonus?

The above Times article discusses some of the strategies and factors to consider in making this decision.  In addition, it points the reader to the website www.metrocardbonuscalculator.com that allows the user to experiment with various purchasing scenarios.

Fare hikes have become more commonplace over the past few years, but reliable public transit is still a bargain.  And I’d pay an extra few cents for some additional cleaning crews.

Paradoxes, Etc

stumpedThis is an engaging, if verbose, article in the NYT about logical paradoxes.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/paradoxical-truth/

There’s not much new ground covered here, but the author touches on some of the classics–the Liar’s Paradox (Is the statement “This sentence is false” true or false?), Zeno’s Paradox (you’ll never get from point A to point B because first you have to get halfway to B, say C, then halfway between C and B, say D, and so on).

The author notes that writers and philosophers love paradoxes.  Students love paradoxes, too.  It’s always enjoyable making a student act out Zeno’s paradox by making them get infinitely close to the board, or arguing about whether there are more even numbers or integers.  And of course, everyone loves arguing about whether .999999999….  really equals 1 .

Another nice feature of this article is that the Comments section itself demonstrates a paradox:  hundreds of people with nothing to say, saying plenty.  It reminds me a lot of being in Philosophy class.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: