Regents Recap — January 2016: No, It Wasn’t

The graph below was created by an employee at a gas station.

No, it wasn’t.gas station graphThis problem from the January, 2016 Common Core Algebra Regents exam is just the latest in a long list of examples of absurdly contrived contexts on high-stakes exams.  There seems to be a school of thought that believes we should go to great lengths to humanize test questions; I honestly can’t imagine why.

Not only does this fabricated context add nothing of value of this problem, it sends the message to students that applications of math are pointless and nonsensical.  And as I argue in my talk g = 4, and Other Lies the Test Told Me, I fear that these messages add up over time.

Yet we know at least one good thing that came from this absurd test question:  statistician Thomas Lumley was creatively inspired by this graph to imagine an amusing back-story!  You can read it at his blog.

And you can find more of my critiques of New York State mathematics exams here.

Related Posts

 

Celebrating Pi Day

polygons of fixed sideThough I would not consider myself a Pi Day enthusiast, Pi Day has become a sort of Mathematical Awareness day, and so I’ve tried to find meaningful ways to observe it with my students.

One aspect of Pi that I try to get students to appreciate is its invariance.  It’s not just that Pi is the ratio of circumference to diameter in a circle; it’s that Pi is the ratio of circumference to diameter in every circle.  It’s an invariant of circles.  And one way I try to get students to appreciate and respect that invariance is by computing “Pi” for other figures.

For example, consider the square.  The circumference of a square is simply its perimeter.  You could choose to consider the red segment below, which is equal in length to a side of the square, as the square’s diameter.

pi day square

Thus, we can calculate “Pi” for a square to be

Pi = \frac{Circumference}{Diameter} = \frac{Perimeter}{Side} = \frac{4s}{s}=4

Thoughtful students may have other suggestions for the “diameter”, which can be a fun exploration in and of itself.  But one way to sidestep this controversy is to simply define “Pi” in a more robust way.

Notice that, in a circle, we have

\frac{Circumference^2}{Area} = \frac{(2 \pi r)^2}{\pi r^2} = \frac{4 \pi^2 r^2}{\pi r^2} = 4\pi

So we can define “Pi” for any plane figure to be one-fourth the ratio of the square of its perimeter to its area.

This simplifies matters, because area and perimeter are well-defined for most figures, whereas diameter is not.  And it’s nice that this new “Pi” is still 4 for a square, since we have

\frac{1}{4} \frac{Perimeter^2}{Area} = \frac{1}{4} \frac{(4s)^2}{s^2} = \frac{1}{4} \frac{16s^2}{s^2} = 4

Once students have generalized the notion of “Pi”, there are several interesting directions to go.  First, you can explore the value of “Pi” for other regular polygons.  What is “Pi” for a regular hexagon?  For a regular octagon?

Of course, something wonderful happens as you look at regular polygons with more and more sides.  With some elementary geometry and trigonometry to derive the formula for the area of a regular n-gon, you can numerically explore convergence to Pi.  And with some knowledge of limits, you can actually prove it converges to Pi!

You could also fix n and explore values of “Pi” for irregular n-gons.  For example, set n = 4 and compare and contrast “Pi” for different rectangles, rhombuses, and parallelograms.  It’s interesting to investigate which kinds of figures have “Pi” values closest to the actual value of Pi.  You might even use this idea to develop a metric for equilateralness.

In one of my classes. we took our discussion of “Pi” up a dimension.  With help from a Pi Day grant from Math for America, we used Zometool to explore the value of Pi for solids in 3 dimensions.

We built models of cubes, dodecahedra, icosahedra, triacontahedra, and other solids.  We debated which solids had “Pi” values closest to the actual value of Pi.  Then, starting from the assumption that

Pi \sim \frac{SA^3}{V^2}

we calculated “Pi” for our various solids.  Students had a great time with this hands-on activity!

Pi Day

And most importantly, students came away with a better understanding of, and appreciation for, this remarkable constant.

So let’s find meaningful mathematical ways to celebrate Pi Day!  Make it a Pi Day resolution.

Related Posts

 

Who Needs Math? A Student Responds

For a political science professor, Andrew Hacker is surprisingly familiar to math teachers.  His 2012 New York Times Op-Ed “Is Algebra Necessary?” generated lots of conversation in the math education community, including several pieces from me:  “N Ways to Use Algebra With the New York Times” in NYT Learning, and “Replace Algebra with Algebra?”.

Professor Hacker is back in 2016 promoting a new book, and in a recent NYT interview he revives his anti-math arguments from four years ago:  math is not really necessary for jobs; it’s too hard; it prevents students from graduating.

I saw the piece and didn’t feel the need to respond.  There was nothing new, and I’d said what I wanted to say here.

But I was pleasantly surprised when I saw this letter-to-the-editor, written by a high school student, published in the February 19th edition of the New York Times.

In “Who Needs Math? Not Everybody” (Education Life, Feb. 7), Andrew Hacker, who teaches quantitative reasoning at Queens College, says that since only 5 percent of people use algebra and/or geometry in their jobs, students don’t need to learn these subjects.

As a high school student, I strongly disagree.

The point of learning is to understand the world. If the only point of learning is job preparation, why should students learn history, or read Shakespeare?

And while your job may never require you to know the difference between a postulate and a theorem, it will almost certainly require other math-based skills, like how to prove something or how to understand a graph.  

And my surprise turned to delight when I realized that the author is a 9th grader in my Geometry class!

While her love of mathematics and her wonderful attitude toward learning certainly predate my Geometry course, I am very proud to see reflections of our classroom in her letter.

You can read the full text of her letter here.

Related Posts

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: