Strogatz, the NYT, and Mathematical Packing

My latest article for the New York Times Learning Network turning Steven Strogatz’s wonderful “Math, Revealed” essays into teaching and learning resources is out. This piece is about mathematical packing, the age-old human quest to find efficiency in organization, and covers everything from packing soda cans in a box to packing information in high-dimensional spaces! It also includes some easy-to-state, but yet unsolved, mathematical conjectures about the best way to fit squares in squares.

The piece is freely available here, and includes free access to Professor Strogatz’s original essay.

Related Posts

Good AI, Bad AI

At the start of the school year I asked my students to let me know how they are using AI in my courses. I’ve seen some Good AI, and some Bad AI.

Good AI

I make mathematical computing a part of my year-long Linear Algebra course. The varying levels of computer programming experience among my students makes this a challenge: some could intern at Google and some can’t remember how a for loop works. AI Coding Assistants, used appropriately, provide invaluable support for students with limited experience. If they can’t successfully write a program to add two rows of a matrix together, they can have the Coding Assistant do it, check to see if it works, and then review the code themselves and try to learn something. Good AI! Here, “appropriate use” means making an honest effort to complete the challenge yourself first: This builds context for learning from whatever code the AI produces, and it also better positions the student to evaluate whether or not the code actually does what they asked it to do.

Bad AI

At the beginning of my Calculus course I ask students to write about a “mathematical observation” they’ve had. I am intentionally vague about what a “mathematical observation” is. Some students write about analyzing their commute to school, some about optimizing a video game strategy, some about a number theory course they took in a summer program. One goal of the assignment is to learn about my students as individuals and as mathematicians, so knowing what they think constitutes a “mathematical observation” tells me something about them.

One student began their paper by disclosing that they first asked ChatGPT to define “Mathematical Observation” for them. This immediately struck me as Bad AI. Thinking about what constitutes a mathematical observation was the point. Not only did the student ask an AI tool to do their thinking for them, but doing so undermined the very purpose of the assignment: Instead of learning what the student thinks as an individual, I got some averaged-out sentiment from a non-random group of authors.

For the record, the student did write a lovely and thoughtful mathematical observation, but afterwards we had a good conversation about the role of AI tools. “Don’t use AI to do your thinking for you,” I said, which seems like a good place to start in navigating this new landscape.

Strogatz, the NYT, and the Golden Ratio

My latest article for the New York Times Learning Network turning Steven Strogatz’s wonderful “Math, Revealed” essays into teaching and learning resources is out! It’s all about a mathematical idea that has captured humanity’s interest for over 500 years — the golden ratio. Come see how algebra, geometry, calculus, and even dentistry come together in one of math’s most popular numbers.

The piece is freely available here, and also includes free access to the original essay.

Related Posts

Strogatz, the NYT, and Taxicab Geometry

I’m excited to share a new piece I’ve written for the New York Times Learning Network that turns mathematician Steven Strogatz’s excellent “Math, Revealed” essay on Taxicab geometry into a resource for teaching and learning.

If you’ve ever wondered how pi could be equal to 4, or what a perpendicular bisector looks like in the Manhattan metric, take a look! The article includes discussion prompts, creative challenges, and classroom suggestions from algebra to calculus. And it even includes some suggestions from Strogatz himself! The piece is freely available here, and also includes free access to the original essay.

Related Posts

Building Thinking Classrooms

My supervisor has been experimenting with a “Building Thinking Classrooms” (BTC) approach to teaching, so our department began the year by participating in a BTC-style activity: standing in small groups around the room, working on “non-routine” problems on chalk boards / white boards. It was certainly engaging, social, and compelling, but I was definitely missing quiet time to think deeply about the problems on my own. It also seemed nearly impossible to not be influenced by other groups, especially those who quickly arrived at a successful approach. In any event, it was a thoughtful way to start the year, and it led to some great, productive conversations.

Originally posted on Mastodon.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: