Fun With Sliceforms

I was recently inspired to make my first sliceform.

With a handful of index cards, a marker, and some scissors, I was able to make this fun representation of a surface in 3D!

Sliceform Front 1

Turn it to the side, and see the surface from a different perspective.

Sliceform Side

The inspiration was timely, as my Calculus class has been discussing cross-sections, traces, and level curves of surfaces in space.  What a perfect way to demonstrate how to understand a surface by looking at representative slices!

A great, simple tool, and you can see some examples of the sliceforms my students created, like the one seen below, here.

fun with sliceforms

A Geometry Challenge

I recently had some fun with one of my favorite triangles.  It all started with this innocent NY State Regents Exam question:

In triangle ABC, we have a = 15, b = 14, and c = 13.  Find the measure of angle C.

This problem is designed to test the student’s knowledge of the Law of Cosines, but because of the special nature of the 13-14-15 triangle, it’s easy to find angle C without it.

And since it was a multiple choice question, I considered another approach.  I constructed an equilateral triangle with side AB and produced the following diagram:

Before I actually performed the construction, I assumed that third vertex of the equilateral triangle would lie in the interior of the original triangle ABC.  By the construction above, it appears to be outside triangle ABC.

So here’s the challenge:  prove that the third vertex of the equilateral triangle lies inside triangle ABC without using the Law of Cosines!

Fun With a Favorite Triangle

In a post examining the quality of New York State Math Regents exams, I considered the following problem from the 2011 Algebra 2 / Trigonometry exam:

In triangle ABC, we have a = 15, b = 14, and c = 13.  Find the measure of angle C.

This problem is designed to test the student’s knowledge of the Law of Cosines.  The Law of Cosines is an equation relating the three sides and one angle of the triangle; knowledge of any three of those four quantities allows you to determine the fourth.  Substitute the three sides into the equation, perform some algebra and simple trigonometry, and you’ll get the angle.

This isn’t just any triangle, though:  this is the famous 13-14-15 triangle.  The 13-14-15 triangle has some special properties that allow you to solve this problem without using the Law of Cosines!

For example, when you drop the altitude the side of length 14, something amazing happens.

13-14-15 Triangle with altitude

Altitudes are perpendicular to bases, so two applications of the Pythagorean Theorem and a little algebra show that the foot of the altitude, H, divides AC into segments of length 5 and 9.  This means that triangle AHB is a right triangle with sides 5, 12, and 13 and triangle CHB is a right triangle with sides 9, 12, and 15.  As it turns out, our 13-14-15 triangle is just two famous right triangles glued together along a common side!

This makes finding the measure of angle C easy:  since C is an angle in a known right triangle, just use right triangle trigonometry!  Much easier than using the Law of Cosines.

And for the record, this was a multiple choice question.  A clever student had yet another opportunity to eschew the Law of Cosines.

In any triangle, the smallest angle is opposite the shortest side.  This allows us to immediately conclude that angle C is less than 60 degrees and thereby eliminate two of the four answer choices, 67 and 127.  Similarly, the longest side of a triangle is opposite the largest angle, which means that angle A is greater than 60 degrees.  Using a straight-edge and compass, we can construct the following equilateral triangle with side AB.

13-14-15 Triangle with equilateral

The two remaining choices for the measure of angle C are 53 and 59.  Our diagram suggests that angle B is very close to 60 degrees.  Since A is bigger than 60 degrees, C must be less than 60 degrees by roughly that same amount.  So the question is now ‘Is the measure of angle A 7 degrees more than 60, or 1 degree more than 60?”.  If the diagram is to scale (mine is; I’m not sure about the diagram included in the Regents exam), a 7-degree difference seems more likely.  It’s admittedly not a rigorous solution, but it’s not a bad way to navigate to the correct answer.

It’s ironic that there are two reasonable ways to approach this problem without using the Law of Cosines, as this was the only problem on this Trigonometry exam that tested the student’s knowledge of this important relationship.

Math and Art: An Impossible Construction

A favorite pastime of mine is offering impossible problems to students as extra credit, like asking them to find the smallest perfect square that has a remainder of 3 when divided by 4.  I don’t tell them the problems are impossible, of course, as that would ruin the fun.  Usually it engages and confuses them, and it makes them suspicious of me.  That’s a win-win-win in my book.

So while discussing some three-dimensional geometry, I offered extra credit to anyone who could build a model of a Klein bottle.  The Klein bottle is a hard-to-imagine surface that has neither an inside nor an outside; it’s like a bag that is sealed up, but somehow the bag is inverted in on itself.  If you are familiar with the Mobius strip, the Klein bottle is basically a Mobius strip, one dimension up.

One reason that the Klein bottle is hard to visualize is that it can’t exist in three dimensions.  It needs a fourth dimension in order to twist around on itself, kind of like the way the Mobius strip (which itself is two-dimensional) needs that third dimension to twist through before you tape it back together.  So, I was pretty impressed with the student who made this:


Not bad at all, for someone who is dimensionally challenged.  Here’s a nice representation for comparison, although it’s still a cheat:  the Klein bottle really doesn’t intersect itself.

A nice example of student work!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: