Looks half-full to me. Interesting extension though: that looks like more than half though. Seems a lot like an optical illusion or something, doesn’t it? 😛
A nice little problem would be to find the height required to fill the cone exactly half-way, in terms of the radius of the base and the slant-height of the cone (or, equivalently, the “angle” of the cone).
dhc
· July 10, 2010 at 12:34 am
Another extension is not using a right cone (slanted cone instead) with the same height.
As I see it, the cone is half-empty, but apparently that makes me a pessimist.
My latest contribution to the New York Times Learning Network’s 15-Minute Lesson Plan series was inspired by Siobhan Roberts’s wonderful article on the geometry of the soccer ball. The Learning Network article is freely available Read more
A snow day snow array! I thought of punching out that one stubborn entry, but let it be in the spirit of wabi-sabi. It’s like the Great British Baking Show’s missing raspberry. Related Posts
I’ve always found it cool that if you double the smaller acute angle in a 3-4-5 triangle you get the larger acute angle in a 7-24-25 right triangle. You can see this as a consequence Read more
3 Comments
Sam Kolins · July 7, 2010 at 5:27 pm
Looks half-full to me. Interesting extension though: that looks like more than half though. Seems a lot like an optical illusion or something, doesn’t it? 😛
mrhonner · July 8, 2010 at 9:07 am
A nice little problem would be to find the height required to fill the cone exactly half-way, in terms of the radius of the base and the slant-height of the cone (or, equivalently, the “angle” of the cone).
dhc · July 10, 2010 at 12:34 am
Another extension is not using a right cone (slanted cone instead) with the same height.
As I see it, the cone is half-empty, but apparently that makes me a pessimist.