Looks half-full to me. Interesting extension though: that looks like more than half though. Seems a lot like an optical illusion or something, doesn’t it? 😛
A nice little problem would be to find the height required to fill the cone exactly half-way, in terms of the radius of the base and the slant-height of the cone (or, equivalently, the “angle” of the cone).
dhc
· July 10, 2010 at 12:34 am
Another extension is not using a right cone (slanted cone instead) with the same height.
As I see it, the cone is half-empty, but apparently that makes me a pessimist.
Here are some images from Harpa, in Reykjavík, Iceland. Harpa is home to the Iceland Symphony Orchestra and the Icelandic Opera, and is one of the most mathematical buildings I have ever seen. The face Read more…
The new year 2024 is a difference of squares, , which got me thinking about a fun little number theory problem: Is there a largest number that can not be expressed as the difference of Read more…
The new year is one of my favorite kinds of numbers: a difference of squares! This observation got me thinking about what kinds of numbers can be written as the difference of squares. For example, Read more…
3 Comments
Sam Kolins · July 7, 2010 at 5:27 pm
Looks half-full to me. Interesting extension though: that looks like more than half though. Seems a lot like an optical illusion or something, doesn’t it? 😛
mrhonner · July 8, 2010 at 9:07 am
A nice little problem would be to find the height required to fill the cone exactly half-way, in terms of the radius of the base and the slant-height of the cone (or, equivalently, the “angle” of the cone).
dhc · July 10, 2010 at 12:34 am
Another extension is not using a right cone (slanted cone instead) with the same height.
As I see it, the cone is half-empty, but apparently that makes me a pessimist.