Looks half-full to me. Interesting extension though: that looks like more than half though. Seems a lot like an optical illusion or something, doesn’t it? 😛
A nice little problem would be to find the height required to fill the cone exactly half-way, in terms of the radius of the base and the slant-height of the cone (or, equivalently, the “angle” of the cone).
dhc
· July 10, 2010 at 12:34 am
Another extension is not using a right cone (slanted cone instead) with the same height.
As I see it, the cone is half-empty, but apparently that makes me a pessimist.
A snow day snow array! I thought of punching out that one stubborn entry, but let it be in the spirit of wabi-sabi. It’s like the Great British Baking Show’s missing raspberry. Related Posts
I’ve always found it cool that if you double the smaller acute angle in a 3-4-5 triangle you get the larger acute angle in a 7-24-25 right triangle. You can see this as a consequence Read more
Here are some images from Harpa, in Reykjavík, Iceland. Harpa is home to the Iceland Symphony Orchestra and the Icelandic Opera, and is one of the most mathematical buildings I have ever seen. The face Read more
3 Comments
Sam Kolins · July 7, 2010 at 5:27 pm
Looks half-full to me. Interesting extension though: that looks like more than half though. Seems a lot like an optical illusion or something, doesn’t it? 😛
mrhonner · July 8, 2010 at 9:07 am
A nice little problem would be to find the height required to fill the cone exactly half-way, in terms of the radius of the base and the slant-height of the cone (or, equivalently, the “angle” of the cone).
dhc · July 10, 2010 at 12:34 am
Another extension is not using a right cone (slanted cone instead) with the same height.
As I see it, the cone is half-empty, but apparently that makes me a pessimist.