The 11-10-11 Triangle

Today’s date, 11-10-11, reminded me to re-visit a recent post that posed the question “Which triangle is more equilateral:  the 10-10-11 triangle, or the 10-11-11 triangle?”

The original post elicited lots of great comments from readers, who weighed in on what they thought the question meant and how they might go about trying to answer it.  I offered one approach, and an answer to the question, in this follow up post.

As a math teacher, there are many reasons I try to create problems like this.  Here are a few that I think are important.

First and foremost, in order to address this question, a significant amount of thought must be put into deciding what the question means.  This process involves analysis, synthesis, reflection, and ideally discussion, all of which will be substantially mathematical in nature.

A second, related, virtue is that there is no obviously correct interpretation of what this question means.  Mathematics is often viewed in stark terms:  answers are either right or wrong.  But the certitude of mathematics comes only after we agree on mathematical models for our given problem.  There is often great debate about what those models should look like; the history of mathematics is full of such debate.

Problems like this one invite students into the modelling process, where they can discuss and debate the validity of various approaches.  Moreover, the problem allows solvers to create multiple different models to explore, compare, and contrast.  And in the end, we can pose and explore meta-mathematical question like “Which model most closely aligns with our intuitions?” and “Which model is the most useful?”

Lastly, this problem demonstrates one role creativity plays in mathematics.  A simple response to the question, one I heard many times, is “Neither of these triangles are equilateral.  They are both equally unequilateral.”  Given our rigid definition of what equilateralmeans, this response is technically correct.  But by relaxing our ideas about equilateral, by allowing ourselves to ponder what the phrase “more equilateral” might mean, by thinking creatively about what kinds of questions we can ask, we create an opportunity to explore, and possibly uncover, some new mathematical ideas.

Math Lesson: Fantasy Football

My latest contribution to the New York Times Learning Network is a Math Lesson designed around a simple Fantasy Football-style game.

https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/put-me-in-coach-getting-in-the-quantitative-game-with-fantasy-football/

In this lesson, students use data, statistics, and a novel matchup metric to evaluate players and choose their teams.

As the results come in every week, students can refine their strategies and try to make more accurate projections!

Fun with the PSAT

My students were recently making fun of some of the math problems on the PSAT.  Apparently, one of the questions went something like this:

After having a bit of a laugh about it, we decided to try to help the PSAT exam writers make a more interesting question.  Here is our revision:

Creating this new question was far more interesting than solving the original!  And thanks to Wolfram|Alpha, we can easily check the answer.

Collection of Science Demonstrations

This is an amazing resource:   a collection of science demonstrations from Harvard Natural Sciences Lecture Demonstration Services.

https://sciencedemonstrations.fas.harvard.edu/catalog

There are hundreds of demonstrations in the archive.  Each entry includes an in-depth description of the scientific principle(s) on display in the demonstration, as well as detailed instructions on how to execute the demo.

Topics include Newtonian Mechanics, Light and Optics, and Thermal Physics.  There is also a collection of mathematical demonstrations, as well as a small set of videos.

And be sure to check out their Facebook page here:  http://www.facebook.com/NatSciDemos

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: