The Write Angle for Teaching Math: Why Write in Math Class?

Math WritingFinding ways to get students to write about mathematics has played a pivotal role in my development and growth as a math teacher.  Mathematical writing challenges students to express their ideas clearly and efficiently; it forces students to stop thinking of mathematics as merely equations and answers; and it opens up a new and unexpected dialogue between math teacher and student.

I have always found great value and pleasure in writing.  It is a valuable skill, a necessary tool of scholarship, and a powerful creative outlet.  And now I see its value as a math teacher.  The more my students write, the more useful and interesting we all find it.

In this post, I’ll first address the question “Why Write in Math Class?”.

Why Write in Math Class?

There are infinitely many good reasons to write.  I’ll offer three that have been on my mind lately.

1)  Writing is a fundamental mathematical skill

Many people might not be aware of it, and many might not admit it, but good writing is a fundamental mathematical skill.  A proof isn’t a proof unless others understand it, and that can’t happen if it isn’t written clearly and concisely.  Also, it’s great when we find the right answer in a math problem, but as most teachers know, it’s usually more important to understand the problem-solving process than to get the right answer.  Good writing skills help narrate and record that process, and make that process available for teachers and peers to understand.

2)  Writing is an indispensible professional skill

I’ve had many different jobs in my life, and being a good writer made me more effective at all of them.  Whether designing technology systems, meeting with clients or consultants, talking through project specifications, or working on a team, being able to document and communicate effectively about the process gave me an edge.   Writing about mathematical ideas and procedures can be hard, but it’s great training for thinking and communicating about the kinds of open-ended problems students will face in the real world.

3)  Writing helps me understand my students better

By regularly interacting with my students through writing, I get to know them in a significantly different way than through their work on exams and homework.  Through various writing activities, I can develop a better sense of what kinds of math problems they like, what kinds of problem-solving techniques they are most comfortable with, and of course, what kinds of ideas are difficult for them to consume.  Getting a different look at how my students think mathematically is incredibly valuable as a teacher, and it can be extremely fun, too!  Giving students the chance to think and write creatively about math almost always produces something unexpectedly wonderful!

For more resources, see my Writing in Math Class page.

The Terrible Trapezoid

Schoolbook ran a piece on yet another terrible test question, this one appearing on the New York State fifth grade math exam.  The most disturbing part of the situation is that no one really seems to understand just how bad this question is.

The New York Times framed the issue as requiring the student to use a technique outside the normal curriculum; the problem is worse than that.  The NYS education commissioner dismissed the error as a “typo”‘; the error can not be considered a typo.  The chancellor of the NY Board of Regents decreed that anyone who claims the tests are invalid is just pushing back against teacher evaluations; no one who understands mathematics can claim that this question is valid.

The problem starts with a trapezoid of sides 5, 16, 13, and 28.  After asking the student to find the perimeter of the trapezoid, the problem then states

A new trapezoid is formed by doubling the lengths of sides AB and CD.  Find the perimeter of the new trapezoid.

 And here’s where the trouble begins.

1)  Is this a right trapezoid?

The Schoolbook piece assumes that the trapezoid is a right trapezoid, i.e., that angle ADC is a right angle.  Nowhere in the problem is it stated or indicated that the trapezoid is right.  And even if we know that it is right, 5th graders are not expected to know the Pythagorean Theorem.

2)  Why does BC change while AD remains constant?

The Schoolbook piece also assumes that as AB and CD are doubled, the length of AD remains constant while the length of BC changes.  Thus, in order to find the new perimeter, the student must find the new length of BC (using the Pythagorean Theorem).

This is the critical error in the construction of this problem:  the test authors don’t seem to understand the subtleties of scaling figures.

Doubling AB and CD doesn’t specify a unique new trapezoid.  BC could change while AD remains constant; AD could change while BC remains constant; AD and BC could both change.  (It is interesting to note that it is impossible to double AB and CD while keeping both AD and BC constant).

Was the original intent to tell the students, or have them assume, that the angles stayed the same?  If so, the resulting figure could not exist.

Was the original intent to tell the students, or have them assume, that AD was also supposed to be doubled?  If so, this still doesn’t specify a unique new trapezoid (unless the angles also remain constant).

The concept of this problem is fundamentally flawed, and it demonstrates a real lack of mathematical understanding on the part of those who created, edited, and screened it.

What’s worse, education officials pretend that this is just a ‘typo’, and that this is no reason to question that validity of these tests.

If the consistent appearance of erroneous math questions on state exams year after year doesn’t constitute legitimate criticism of the validity of these exams, then what possibly could?

Related Posts

Real School Reform?

Public school teachers seem to be enduring a lot of vocal criticism these days, as politicians and “reformers” call for measures that tie student performance to teacher job security.

While genuine public discourse about educational policy and philosophy should be a good thing for us all, it’s all too easy to lay the “accountability” at the feet of teachers and ignore the many other factors that contribute to student “performance”, some of which may be even more fundamental to student success.

For example, it turns out that if we provide students with healthier, more nutritious meals, they will perform better and miss less school.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/apr/10/school-dinners-jamie-oliver

Test scores up.  Absenteeism down.  Lifetime income substantially raised.  All by replacing industrial, highly-processed cafeteria food with the real thing.

I always liked Jamie Oliver.

Presenting at TEDxNYED

I will be presenting today at the 2012 TEDxNYED conference at the Museum of the Moving Image in Queens, New York.

http://tedxnyed.com/2012/speakers/patrick-honner/

I will be giving a short presentation on creativity and mathematics.  I am very excited to be a part of the event, and to see other presenters like Christopher Emdin, Frank Noschese,  Bre Pettis, and many others!

The event will be live-streamed.  More information can be found at the TEDxNYED website.

Math Lesson: Summer Math

My latest contribution to the New York Times Learning Network is a collection of activities for having some summer fun with math!

https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/25/these-days-are-numbered-eight-summer-math-ideas/

I will definitely be enjoying the quantitative aspects of the Olympics this year, and I may just embark upon a personal data study like Stephen Wolfram did!

Any other ways to have fun with math over the summer?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: