Infinite Prime Gaps

p p+2The mathematics world is abuzz with news that someone may have proved a weak version of the Twin Prime conjecture.

A pair of numbers are called twin primes if the two numbers are both prime and they differ by 2.  Examples of twin primes include 11 and 13, 29 and 31, and 137 and 139.  Notice that for all prime numbers other than 2, twin primes are as close as two prime numbers could possibly be:  the number between the twin primes will always be even, and thus not prime.

The Twin Prime conjecture simply postulates that there are infinitely many pairs of twin primes.  Although it is simple to state, the Twin Prime conjecture has been hard to prove:  it has been an open question in Number Theory for hundreds of years.  But a breakthrough has been made.  Someone apparently has proved that there are infinitely many pairs of primes that differ by at most 70 million!

Now, being 70 million apart isn’t the same as being 2 apart, so at first glance this result may not seem significant or relevant.  But the difference between 70 million and 2 is nothing compared to the difference bewteen 70 million and infinity!  Essentially, this result says that no matter how far out you go on the number line, you can always find two primes that are relatively close to each other, where relatively close here means “no more than 70 million apart”.

And while being 70 million away may not seem close as far as prime numbers go, consider the following amazing fact:  given any number N, we can find a string of N consecutive numbers that contains no primes at all!  That is, we can find “gaps” between the primes as large as imaginable:  70 million, 700 million, 7 trillion trillion, and beyond.  What’s more, it’s quite easy to prove this fact.

Consider n! = n*(n-1)*(n-2)*...*3*2*1.  Since n! is the product of all the integers from 1 to n, it is clear that every integer less than or equal to n divides n!.

Now, since n! is divisible by 2, we know (n! + 2) must also be divisible by 2.  Similarly, since n! is divisible by 3, then (n! + 3) must be divisble by 3, and so on.   Thus, we have the following sequence of n-1 consecutive numbers

n! + 2, n! + 3, n! + 4, . . . , n! + (n-1), n! + n

none of which are prime!  For example, if n = 5, the numbers 5! + 2, 5! + 3, 5! + 4, and 5! + 5 are

122, 123, 124, 125

which are are consecutive and not prime.

Using this technique, we can generate strings of consecutive non-primes of any length.  For example, if we let n = 70 million, we’ll get a string of 70 million – 1 consecutive non-primes.  Or if we let n = 1 googol (10^{100}), we’ll get a string of  10^{100} - 1 consecutive non-primes!

This technique shows if we go out very far on the number line we are sure to find huge gaps bewteen prime numbers.  But according to the new mathematical result, no matter how far out we go, we can always find primes that are relatively close to each other.

This is a major result, and an exciting day for mathematics!

5/12/13 — Happy Right Triangle Day!

Happy Right Triangle Day!  Today we celebrate a favorite geometric object:  the 5-12-13 right triangle.

5-12-13 Triangle blue

Of course, the sides of this triangle satisfy the Pythagorean Theorem

5^2 + 12^2 = 13^2

but one reason I like this particular right triangle so much is the role it plays in another favorite triangle.  The 5-12-13 triangle fits together perfectly with the 9-12-15 right triangle

5-12-13 plus 9-12-15 Triangle blue

 

to make the 13-14-15 triangle!

13-14-15 triangle blue

The 13-14-15 triangle is special in its own right:  it is a Heronian triangle, a triangle with rational side lengths and rational area.  In fact, this triangle has  integer side lengths and integer area, making it especially interesting!

Happy Right Triangle Day!  Be sure to marvel at some perpendicularity today.

2013 Rosenthal Prize

Premomath logoliminary applications for the 2013 Rosenthal Prize for Innovation in Math Teaching are due Friday, May 10th.

The Rosenthal Prize, presented by the Museum of Mathematics, is designed to celebrate and promote the development and sharing of creative, engaging, replicable math lessons.  The author of the winning activity receives $25,000, and the lesson will be freely shared with teachers around the world by the Museum of Mathematics.

Although May 10th is fast approaching, this first deadline is just a preliminary one.   If the application process is anything like last year’s, all that is required at this early stage are a few short essays about teaching philosophy and the overviews of the lessons you intend to submit in the fall.  If an applicant passes through the preliminary stage, a more comprehensive application portfolio will likely be due in the fall of 2013.  Again, this assumes the process is similar to last year’s.

If you’ve got some fun, engaging, and replicable math lessons to share with the world, consider applying for the Rosenthal Prize!  More information can be found here.

Scientific American on the Rosenthal Prize

rosenthal prize imageI am proud to be featured in the Roots of Unity blog at Scientific American.

Evelyn Lamb’s piece, “Award Winning Teachers Put Math on Hands and Heads“, reports on the inaugural Rosenthal Prize for Innovation in Math Teaching, presented by the Museum of Mathematics.

As runner-up for the Rosenthal Prize, I was interviewed for the piece, and had a chance to talk about my teaching philosophy, my award-winning lesson, and the value of hands-on, collaborative activities in mathematics class.  In summarizing my approach to teaching mathematics, I said

“I want the classroom to be a place where we explore ideas together, where students can play around, experiment, collaborate, argue, create, and reflect on everything.”

The purpose of the Rosenthal Prize is to encourage and promote innovative, replicable math activities that engage and excite students.  I’m honored to be a part of this endeavor, and I look forward to more fun and creative math lessons being shared in the future.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: