Here is yet another mathematically erroneous question from New York’s June 2017 Geometry Regents exam.

At first this question seems straightforward. There are several ways to determine if two triangles are similar, and the answer choices cover three of the basics: in (1) segment *AB* is parallel to segment *ED*, so congruent alternate interior angles can be used to show that the triangles are similar by *Angle-Angle *(*AA*); in (3) *Side-Angle-Side *(*SAS*)* *similarity can be used; and in (4), *Side-Side-Side *(*SSS*)* *similarity applies since all three pairs of sides are in proportion.

Presumably (2) is the answer choice that does not guarantee the triangles will be be similar, and according to the official scoring guide provided by the state (2) is the correct answer. But as it turns out, (2) is also sufficient to guarantee that the triangles are similar. This means that this question has no correct answer.

In (2), we have two pairs of sides in proportion and one pair of congruent angles (the vertical angles *ECD* and *ACB*). This is the *Side-Side-Angle* (*SSA*) scenario, and because this set of information does not determine a unique triangle, *SSA* alone is not sufficient to establish that a pair of triangles are similar (or congruent).

But there is additional information to work with in this question. The lengths of the sides of the triangles guarantee that angles *B* and *D* are both acute. This is because there can be at most one non-acute angle in any triangle, which is necessarily the triangle’s largest angle, and the largest angle in a triangle must be opposite the triangle’s longest side. Since angles *B* and* **D* are not opposite their respective triangle’s longest side, they must be acute angles. And it turns out that this additional piece of information allows us to conclude that the triangles are similar.

Here’s why. Suppose you know the lengths of segments *XY *and *YZ *and the measure of an acute angle *Z*. Depending on the length of *XY*, there are 0, 1, or 2 possible triangles *XYZ*. Here’s a geometric representation of all the possibilities:

This explains why *SSA* fails to uniquely determine a triangle: there may exist two different triangles consistent with the given information.

But if two triangles *XYZ* are possible, one of the triangles will have an obtuse angle at *X* and the other will have an acute angle at *X*. This means that if we happen to know that angle *X* is acute, then only one triangle *XYZ* is possible, and so this set of information (*SSA* and the nature of the angles opposite the given sides) uniquely identifies a triangle and can be used to establish similarity (or congruence) among a pair of triangles. Thus, the information in (2) is sufficient to conclude the triangle are similar, and so there is no correct answer to the above exam question.

Alternately, a more algebraic argument uses the Law of Sines. From triangle *ABC* we get

and from triangle *EDC* we get

And since

we can conclude that

Generally speaking we can’t conclude that the measure of angle *B* is equal to the measure of angle *D: *two angles with the same sine could be supplements or differ by a full revolution. But since we know both angles are acute, we can conclude that

Thus, the triangles are similar by *AA. *(This argument also shows that *SSA* together with knowledge of the nature of the angles is a congruence theorem.)

So, this high-stakes exam question has no correct answer. And despite the Change.org petition started by a 16-year old student that made national news, the New York State Education Department refuses to issue a correction. In fact, they refuse to acknowledge the indisputable fact that this question has no correct answer, perhaps because they don’t want to admit that a third question on this exam (see question 14 and question 22) has been determined to be mathematically erroneous.

UPDATE: All the media attention apparently convinced the NYSED to award full credit to all test takers for this erroneous question. Due to the *discrepancy in wording*, of course (link).

**Related Posts**