<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Derivatives of Even Functions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://MrHonner.com/2012/09/14/derivatives-of-even-functions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://MrHonner.com/2012/09/14/derivatives-of-even-functions/</link>
	<description>Math Appreciation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:30:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrHonner</title>
		<link>http://MrHonner.com/2012/09/14/derivatives-of-even-functions/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>MrHonner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MrHonner.com/?p=9001#comment-1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that is probably the quickest proof.  I shared the original proof because I really like that trick of splitting up every function an even part and an odd part (here, since the function here is even to begin with, it has only an even part).

I don&#039;t think either of these algebraic proofs are very illuminating, though, which is why I like the tangent line argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is probably the quickest proof.  I shared the original proof because I really like that trick of splitting up every function an even part and an odd part (here, since the function here is even to begin with, it has only an even part).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think either of these algebraic proofs are very illuminating, though, which is why I like the tangent line argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://MrHonner.com/2012/09/14/derivatives-of-even-functions/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MrHonner.com/?p=9001#comment-1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hmm..
What about writing f(x) = f(-x) (by definition)?
Differentiating both sides gives us
f&#039;(x) = f&#039;(-x)*(-1) (by the Chain Rule).
So by definition f&#039; is odd.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm..<br />
What about writing f(x) = f(-x) (by definition)?<br />
Differentiating both sides gives us<br />
f&#8217;(x) = f&#8217;(-x)*(-1) (by the Chain Rule).<br />
So by definition f&#8217; is odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrHonner</title>
		<link>http://MrHonner.com/2012/09/14/derivatives-of-even-functions/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>MrHonner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MrHonner.com/?p=9001#comment-1158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a more &lt;i&gt;natural&lt;/i&gt; proof would show that the tangents to an even function at x = c and x = -c have opposite slopes.  This probably follows pretty quickly from the definition of derivative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a more <i>natural</i> proof would show that the tangents to an even function at x = c and x = -c have opposite slopes.  This probably follows pretty quickly from the definition of derivative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Prior</title>
		<link>http://MrHonner.com/2012/09/14/derivatives-of-even-functions/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Prior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MrHonner.com/?p=9001#comment-1157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impressive derivation, I enjoyed it. Any other similar proofs you&#039;d recommend?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive derivation, I enjoyed it. Any other similar proofs you&#8217;d recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrHonner</title>
		<link>http://MrHonner.com/2012/09/14/derivatives-of-even-functions/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>MrHonner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MrHonner.com/?p=9001#comment-1155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sue-

I factored out a (-1) from the numerator.  Now rearrange the terms in the numerator and you&#039;ll have (f&#039;(x) - f&#039;(-x)), which is the numerator of a&#039;(x).

Sorry if I sacrificed a bit of clarity for brevity!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue-</p>
<p>I factored out a (-1) from the numerator.  Now rearrange the terms in the numerator and you&#8217;ll have (f&#8217;(x) &#8211; f&#8217;(-x)), which is the numerator of a&#8217;(x).</p>
<p>Sorry if I sacrificed a bit of clarity for brevity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue VanHattum</title>
		<link>http://MrHonner.com/2012/09/14/derivatives-of-even-functions/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue VanHattum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MrHonner.com/?p=9001#comment-1154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last line, after 3rd = sign, I&#039;m not seeing it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last line, after 3rd = sign, I&#8217;m not seeing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
